A.S. Kultaev ¹, I.A. Zakiryarov ²

1. «Kazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology» JSC, Almaty, the Republic of Kazakhstan;
2. «Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University» NAO, Almaty, the Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.52532/2663-4864-2022-4-66-24-32

UDC: 616-006.66:618.19:073.43

Year: 2022 issure: 66 number: 4 pages: 24-32

Download PDF:

ABSTRACT

Relevance: Worldwide, mammary gland formations remain a public health dilemma. Breast cancer (BC) is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality. Breast cancer ranked 3rd with 8.7-8.1% in the structure of malignant disease mortality in Kazakhstan in 2018-2019.
Female breast cancer is the most common cancer. Over 2.2 million cases of breast cancer were registered in 2020, according to the WHO. Worldwide, breast cancer ranks fifth among the causes of mortality (685,000 deaths per year).
On average, about 3,000 breast cancer cases are detected yearly in the Republic of Kazakhstan, and more than 1,380 women die from this disease. The high increment rate of breast cancer incidence and mortality, which is ahead of most other cancers, puts breast cancer at the top of the list.
Technological developments in medicine have positively influenced the diagnosis of mammary gland formations. The S-Detect function for the mammary gland formations had been introduced by Samsung Medison, which helps to determine the formation and characterize the affected area. The sonoelastography methods were used for reliable assessment in the early days.
The study aimed to: determine the role of the S-Detect function in the differential diagnosis of mammary gland formations.
Methods: A comparative analysis of images taken with the S-Detect function and by the sonoelastography process was carried out in 50 patients.
Results: S-Detect program showed correct diagnosis in 92% of cases (46 out of 50 people), confirmed by the results of morphological verification (histology, cytology). The sonoelastography method showed correct results in 80% of cases (40 out of 50 people).
Conclusion: The use of S-Detect technology in analyzing mammary gland formations showed good consistency with B-mode, color, and power Doppler mapping. S-Detect technology can effectively help novice radiologists in writing conclusions.
Keywords: S-Detect Breast, BI-RADS, breast ultrasound, breast formation, sonoelastography.
List of sources used:

1. Goncharova T.G., Kaidarova D.R., Omarbaeva N.A., Askandirova A.B., Orazgalieva M.G., Adilbay D.G., Cheishvili D., Vaisheva F., Szyf M. Development method of early diagnosis of breast cancer based on epigenetic markers // Oncology and radiology of Kazakhstan. – 2020. – No. 4 (58). – P. 29-35 [Goncharova T.G., Kaidarova D.R., Omarbayeva N.A., Askandirova A.B., Orazgaliyeva M.G., Adilbay D.G., Cheishvili D., Vaisheva F., Szyf M. Razrabotka metoda ranney diagnostics raka molochnoj zhelezy na foundation e’pigeneticheskix markerov // Onkologiya i radiologiya Kazakhstan. – 2020. – No. 4 (58). – S. 29-35 (in Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.52532/2521-6414-2020-4-58-29-35.
2. DeSantis Carol E., Bray F., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Anderson B.O., Jemal A. International variation in female breast cancer incidence and mortality rates // Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. – 2015. – Vol. 24(10). – P. 1495-1506. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0535.
3. Chertishcheva I.L., Li V.E., Bekezhan A.B., Masadykov A.S., Shalgumbaeva G.M., Saidualiev D.N. Incidence and mortality from breast cancer in Kazakhstan for 2015-2019 // Science and Health. – 2021. – No. 2 (23). – S. 148-154. [Chertishheva I.L., Li V.E., Bekezhan A.B., Masadykov AS, Shalgumbaeva GM, Sajdualiev DN Zabolevaemost ‘ i smertnost ‘ ot raka molochnoj zhelezy v Kazakhstan za 2015-2019 gody // Science and Zdravooxranenie – 2021. – No. 2 (23). – S. 148-154. (in Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.34689/SH.2021.23.2.016.
4. Beisebaev E.N. Evaluation of the role of social determinants in screening studies and 5-year survival of women with breast cancer: dis. … doc. Philosophy: 6D110200. – Almaty: S.D. Asfendiyarov KazNMU, 2015. – P. 91. [Bejsebaev EN Ocenka roles social’nyx determinantov v screeningovyx issledovaniyax i pyatiletney vyzhivaemosti zhenshhin’s disease raka molochnoj zhelezy: dis. … doc. filosofii : 6D110200. – Almaty: S.D. Asfendiyarov KazNMU, 2015. – 91 s. (in Russ.)]. https://kaznmu.edu.kz/rus/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ THESIS – Beisebayeva – E . H.1.pdf.
5. Clinical protocol for the diagnosis of treatment. Breast cancer: recommended. Expert Council of the RCHD of the MHSD of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated November 27, 2015, protocol No. 17 [Klinicheskij protocol diagnostics treatment. Rak molochnoj zhelezy : rekomend . E’kspertnym sovetom RCRZ MZSR RK ot 27.11.2015, protocol No. 17 (in Russ.)]. https://onco.kz/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/23.pdf.
6. World Health Organization. Mammary cancer. Basic facts. 03/26/2021 [Vsemirnaya organization zdravoxraneniya. Rak molochnoj zhelezy . Fundamentals facts. 03/26/2021 (in Russ.)]. https://www.who.int/ru/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer.
7. Fisher P.R. Ultrasound in breast cancer. 05/15/2019 [Fisher PR UZI pri rake molochnoj zhelezy. May 15, 2019 (in Russ.)]. https://rh.org.ru/statti/uzi-pri-rake-molochnoj-zhelezy/.
8. Zabolotskaya N. B. Grade risks malignancy US BI-RADS using auto classifier S-Detect, dopplerography, and elastography on the Ultrasound scanners Samsung Medison // SonoAce Ultrasound. – 2020. – No. 32. – S. 91-98. [Zabolotskaya N.V. Ocenka riskov zlokachestvennosti US BI-RADS s ispol’zovaniem autoclassificatora S-Detect, dopplerografiii i e’lastografii na UZ- skanerax Samsung Medison // SonoAce Ultrasound. – 2020. – No. 32. – S. 91-98. (in Russ.)] https://www.medison.ru/si/art477.htm
9. Samsung Newsroom. Samsung Brings Together Medical Imaging and AI for Radiologists at RSNA 2018. – USA. – 11/26/2018. https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-brings-together-medical-imaging-and-ai-for-radiologists-at-rsna-2018
10. Duda V., Kohler C., Stamm A., Storch A. Technology ElastoScan in diagnostics diseases dairy glands: top 10 discussed questions // SonoAce Ultrasound. – 2016. – C. 88-93 [Duda V., Kohler C., Stamm A., Storch A. Texnologiya e’lastografii ElastoScan ™ v diagnostics disease milkyx zhelez: 10 samyx obsuzhdaemyx voprosov // SonoAce Ultrasound. – 2016. – S. 88-93 (in Russ.)]. https://www.medison.ru/si/art433.htm
11. Barr RG Future of breast elastography // Ultrasonography. – 2019. – Vol. 38(2). – P. 93-105. https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.18053
12. R.H. Elastography dairy glands, review Literature 11.04.2014 [ RH.E’lastografiya molochnoj zhelezy , obzor literature . 04/11/2014 (in Russ.)]. https://rh.org.ru/statti/elastografiya-molochnoj-zhelezy-obzor-literatury

13. Chen Y., Gao Y., Chang C., Wang F., Zeng W., Chen J. Ultrasound shear wave elastography of breast lesions: correlation of anisotropy with clinical and histopathological findings // BMC Medical Imaging. – 2018. – Vol. 11. https://cancerimagingjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40644-018-0144-x
14. Zheng X., Li F., Xuan Z.D., Wang Y., Zhang L. Combination of shear wave elastography and BI-RADS in the identification of solid breast masses // BMC Med. Image. – 2021. – Vol. 21(1). – Art. ID 183. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00702-4.
15. Dällenbach RZ, Plodinec M., Oertle P., Redling K., Obermann EC, Lim RYH, Schoenenberger CA Length Scale Matters: Real-Time Elastography versus Nanomechanical Profiling by Atomic Force Microscopy for the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions // BioMed. Res. Int. – 2018. – Vol. 2018. – Art. ID 3840597. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3840597.
16. Busko E.A., Semiglazov B.V., Mishchenko A.V., Black A.V., Kostromina E.V., Semiglazova T.Yu., Zaitsev A.N., Kurganskaya I.Kh., Rogachev M. V., Borsukov A. V., Safronova M. A. Compression sonoelastography dairy glands: Educational allowance for doctors’ ultrasonic diagnostics. N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology // St. Petersburg-2015.